The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of eight months) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant generally acknowledges his mistake, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have significant social harm, such as the commercialization of women's sex and harm the sound sexual culture and good morals, and requires strict punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments, the crime of this case is committed during the suspension period of the execution of the same crime, the size of sexual traffic establishments is about 100 square meters, and the business period is not shorter than 2 months (the defendant was in this court, 2 million won per month, 12 hours per day, and 12 hours per day, and is argued that he was involved in the operation of the sexual traffic establishments of this case. However, considering the above circumstances, considering the defendant's argument, it is recognized that the defendant involved in the operation of the sexual traffic establishments of this case is not likely to change the sentencing of the court below, and there is no reason to recognize that the defendant's age, sexual behavior, occupation and environment, motive and circumstances of the crime of this case are too changing after considering the following circumstances.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.