Defendant

A Imprisonment for four months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of twenty million won.

However, the defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling non-ferrous metals with its place of business in Ansan-si, the members of the Dong-gu, and the defendant A is the representative director of the above company and the person in charge of environmental management of the above place of business

1. No person who has obtained permission to install facilities discharging wastewater of Defendant A shall discharge water pollutants from the discharge facilities of wastewater without flowing them into prevention facilities, or install facilities capable of discharging wastewater without flowing them into prevention facilities;

Nevertheless, on January 27, 2004, the Defendant obtained permission from the Gyeonggi-do branch to the manufacturing facility of the same voltage, pressure withdrawal, and annual new products, which are wastewater discharging facilities installed in the said workplace, to the said branch, for the installation of the wastewater containing about 57.02 cubic meters of wastewater containing specific water-quality harmful substances (Cu) generated in the cque course of the said facility, to the storage facility (use 31.5 cubic meters) and to entrust the treatment to a specialized wastewater treatment business entity. However, the Defendant did not entrust the treatment of wastewater containing a specific water-hazardous substance generated in the cquema process from November 14, 2013 to November 27, 2016, the Defendant installed the water pumps (power 1) and 57.0 meters of waste water generated in the said storage facility with an excellent discharge outlet using 50 meters of water generated in the said facility.

2. Defendant B, a representative director of the Defendant, discharged water pollutants discharged from wastewater discharge facilities without flowing them into prevention facilities, in relation to the Defendant’s business at the above time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes governing the place of work;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Article 76 Subparag. 3 and Article 38(1)1 of the Water Quality and Water Quality Conservation Act; the choice of imprisonment;

B. Defendant B: Water quality and water quality.