The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds of appeal is that the evidence to acknowledge the act as described in the facts charged of this case is only the victim's statement, and the victim's unclear statement alone is insufficient to prove the defendant's guilty, but the court below erred in the misapprehension of facts.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances that can be recognized by the court below's judgment and the court below's duly adopted and examined evidence, in particular, in light of the circumstances of the accident, the defendant appears to be in a situation where it is anticipated that if the body of the victim is closely connected with the victim in the stairs, the accident would occur because the victim would lose physical control, and the defendant's power to escape from the victim. It can be recognized that the victim suffered the injury in this case since the balance between the victim and the victim was lost.

① Upon receipt of the initial insurance policy, the Defendant and the victim received the instant accident to Hyundai Commercial Reinsurance Co., Ltd., the Defendant subscribed to as the insured.

While walking the stairs in a fast state, the insurance company stated that the victim was suffering from the defendant's bridge, and later the insurance company's additional investigation was conducted, and the defendant was found to suffer from the loss of the victim's body while putting up the body of the defendant's body, and changed the victim's statement.

2. The victim, at the police station, is a bridge for the defendant in a situation where the defendant runs away with "I am going to the next right once" while "I am to the next right."

“I am at the end of the victim’s right bridge, and am left behind the victim’s right bridge, and am asked why later, she would see why she would her be on the bridge, and she said that she was the victim’s shed and she was on the bridge.

was stated.

(3) The defendant shall be develop.