logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.07.10 2013고단2055
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 13, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced by the Suwon District Court to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for robbery, injury, etc. and completed the execution of the said sentence on March 10, 2013;

1. From April 3, 2013 to April 03:3:00 to April 4, 2013, 203: (a) at the H building parking lot in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju-gu, the damage was inflicted on the part of KRW 70,00 won of the repair cost by breaking the rear left glass window of the victim I, who owns the victim, with a stone attached thereto; and (b) the damage was inflicted on the part of KRW 70,00 of the repair cost.

2. At the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1, the victim I, who is the victim of the foregoing vehicle, was stolen with a 1.50,000 won-based type written license for male women in Vietnam, a total of KRW 150,000,000,000,000,000 in the market value, and with a registration certificate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Previous records in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records, personal identification and current status of confinement;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. From among concurrent crimes, the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act has been sentenced to imprisonment for night time and by larceny, etc. on 2005 even before the criminal defendant had been sentenced to imprisonment for the crime of this case on March 24, 2013, following the execution of a sentence before the judgment, the crime of this case was committed within a short period after being released from prison on March 24, 2013 by the execution of detention in the workhouse, the defendant is against the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant is going against the victim, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim, and the amount of

arrow