The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment of KRW 1.5 million (a fine of KRW 1.5 million) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant found the fireworks of the victim's operation and demanded withdrawal of a complaint for a large amount of time on one-time basis, and interfered with the defendant's operation of the fireworks by demanding the withdrawal of a complaint and taking a bath, and the victim was forced to take time in the process, and even if police officers were dispatched at the time when they received three times or more reports and dispatched to the police officers at that time, they returned to the fireworks house and continued to go back to the fireworks house, and they did not receive a letter of suspicion to the victim. In light of the circumstances of the crime of this case, the crime of this case, the circumstance before and after the crime of this case, relationship with the victim, etc., the crime of this case is very poor, and there is no change of circumstances that can be considered in the sentencing from the judgment of the court below to the trial of the court below, and there is no other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing in this case, such as the defendant's age, character, and nature, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.