The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the investor of the “C” Co., Ltd. with the second floor in Gunsan City, and the victim D (name, leisure, age 47) is the employee of the said company.

On March 2018, the Defendant, within the above “C” office located in the second floor of Simsan-si, Simsan-si, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim three times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, by making the victim known how to implement the mobile phone display, and making the victim known it to the victim. In addition, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim three times in total, by making the victim known the victim of the method to implement the mobile phone display, and by making the victim known it.

2. Since the investigation agency of D (alias) as evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, there are statements in this court, E and F’s statements in this court, and statements by investigation agency.

However, as seen below based on the record, considering the following circumstances and D (tentative name)’s date and time of indecent act, contents and the current situation of indecent act committed by the Defendant against E and D (tentative name), the progress of civil litigation and relation between E and D’s submission of a complaint, E, and F’s relation, etc., it is difficult to believe that D’s investigative agency and this court’s statements (tentative name) are in accord with the facts charged in the instant case. Furthermore, all of the statements in F, E’s investigative agency and this court are merely inconsistent with D(tentative name)’s statements or transferred from D(tentative name). Thus, it is difficult to consider them as evidence of guilt, and there is insufficient evidence otherwise submitted by the Prosecutor to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt as to the facts charged in the instant case.

(1) The progress of civil litigation between the Defendant and D, etc. and the Defendant are virtual currency through “C” operated by G, the husband of E.