beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 21,450,979 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from September 19, 2016 to February 12, 2019.
Reasons
1.The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties or may be admitted by adding to the whole purport of the pleadings the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 6, and 8 to 12:
The plaintiff is a company mainly engaged in the manufacture and sale of clothes, the original processing business, etc., and the defendant is a company mainly engaged in the manufacture, distribution, wholesale and retail business of clothing goods.
The plaintiff has made a transaction to supply the defendant with the original part of the clothes in order to manufacture D, which is a garment, from a window that is supplied to C upon the defendant's order.
B. On April 18, 2016, the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff to supply the KRW 2,490 on the basis of the following content in order to produce the goods requested by C to supply clothing.
Lone Star's order size size size size size size (Y) E SJ-PR8146-12 " 0.84 1,000" 0.84 1,000 C.GRAY 840 C.GJ-PR8146-12 (No. 1. 1. 1.000 0.84 1,200 1,000 SJ-PR-PR8146-12 (No. 1. 2: raw part produced without attaching any other thousand on the back of the original unit)
C. On July 5, 2016, the Plaintiff prepared a written request for ex-factory on July 5, 2016, supplied the Defendant with the original set of KRW 2,490 on July 12, 2016, and issued a tax invoice of KRW 29,410,700 (including value added tax).
The Defendant produced and supplied Category D as a raw body supplied by the Plaintiff and supplied Category C to the Plaintiff, but was unable to supply the remaining clothing excluding the tea carcs color 390Pcs, carel color 200 pcs in the process of product inspection due to the difference between the body plate part of the paper and the part of the main body part of the main body part.
E. The Defendant again ordered the Plaintiff to supply the original unit, and the Plaintiff supplied the original unit of KRW 25,459,720 (including value added tax) to the Defendant on September 12, 2016 and September 2, 2016, and issued a tax invoice with the supply value of KRW 25,459,720 (including value added tax).
F. The defendant is the original body supplied with the above services.