logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.09.18 2015가단500250
임대차보증금
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 20, 2013, Plaintiff C leased each of the instant building 201 from Defendant Tri-ri (U.D., Inc., Ltd., prior to the change) for a lease deposit of KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.5 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.5 million, and two years from the commencement date of the term of lease for the term of lease. The Plaintiff leased the instant building 202 unit for KRW 30 million, KRW 17 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.7 million, and KRW 1.7 million from the commencement date of the term of lease for the term of lease.

B. As to the instant building 201, 202, and 302 on August 4, 2014, Defendant E completed the registration of ownership preservation, and as to the instant building 202 on August 12, 2014, Defendant E’s name and September 1, 2014 each completed the registration of ownership transfer under Defendant D’s name as to the instant building 201.

C. On August 11, 2014, Plaintiff C leased the instant building 202 from Defendant E with a lease deposit of KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.7 million, and the lease term of KRW 1.7 million from August 11, 2014. On August 29, 2014, Plaintiff C leased the instant building 201 from Defendant D with a lease deposit of KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.5 million, and the lease term of KRW 1.5 million from August 11, 2014, respectively.

Plaintiff

A and B leased the instant building 302 from Defendant Tri Co., Ltd. on October 1, 2014, with the lease deposit of KRW 20 million, KRW 1.4 million per month, and the lease term of KRW 1.4 million from October 1, 2014 to October 14, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. At the time of concluding each of the above lease agreements, the Defendants asserted that the lease agreement was concluded for at least 70% of the 60 commercial buildings of this case, and that 100% of the 10th commercial buildings will be sold in lots, and that at least 50% of the 50% of the 50th commercial buildings began to start artificial construction.

In addition, since the sale rate and the sale rate are high, it is high profit in a short period.

arrow