logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.02.07 2016나2046077
부당이득금반환
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff, a corporation with the purpose of real estate development planning and consulting, etc., was to carry out a regional housing association building project (hereinafter “instant project”), which supplies a total of 598 households, such as 425 households of partnership apartment units, SSIFT, and 173 households of long-term lease housing (SHIFT), and a regional housing association building project (hereinafter “instant project”). On September 17, 2010, the first project explanation meeting was held against the large-scale residents, and the second project explanation meeting on October 13 of the same year.

Defendant 1: 10-70-70-70-70-700-70-700-700-700-700-700-700-70-700-70-700-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-77-10-70-77-77-1-7-77-1-77-1-7, 1-7-20-7-7

B. The Plaintiff entered into a trade agreement with the Defendants on the land owned by the Defendants, setting the sales amount as follows.

“A”: The Defendants, “B”, each seller listed in the above table, and “B”: The purpose of this Agreement under Article 1 (Purpose of the Contract) of the Plaintiff is from “B”.

arrow