The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant was found guilty of the facts charged in this case, although he did not 10 times more than 10 the chests of D during the time when he was dispatched after being reported 112 at the time of this case, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred

Judgment

원심 및 당 심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정 즉, ① 경찰공무원 D은 수사기관에서 ‘ 가정폭력신고를 접수하고 피고인의 집안으로 들어갔을 때 피고인이 거실에서 아들을 훈계하다가 방으로 피하였고, 피고인의 아내와 아들이 피고인을 잡아가 달라고 하여, 피고인을 집 밖으로 데려가 폭행 사실 여부를 질문하자, 피고인이 “야 이 씹할 놈 아, 돌 대가리 새끼들 아, 너 그들이 뭘 안다고 왜 남의 가정에 참견을 하느냐

“At the same time, the Defendant made a statement that he was not fluent, but fluor of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit, and that he was not fluor of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch biter at the time, and made a detailed statement in detail and in detail according to the order of time when he was dispatched from the Defendant at the time, and the circumstances when he was brued by the Defendant. The above statement is consistent with the common sense and consistent; ② Police E sent to the scene at the time was reported, and was given a statement by the Defendant at the court of the trial at the time, “A police officer sent to the scene at the time, and was given a statement from the Defendant,” and “A police officer sent to the scene at the scene along with D details, was sent to the South Korean family.”

“Along with the Defendant’s warning, the Defendant made two times the chest of the D security guards and sent a warning to the Defendant, it is consistent with the aforementioned D’s statement by stating that the Defendant continued to sell the chest of the D security guards up to 10 times. ③ At the time of the police investigation, the Defendant was fluent with the D’s statement.