logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.11.16 2017고정1419
재물손괴
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2016, from around 15:30 on the same day to around 19:00 on the same day, the Defendant damaged the part of the passenger car (vehicle No. E) on the upper side of the 101 Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan University, which the victim D(35 years of age, south) parked from the 5th underground level of the 101 Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan University University, so that the e-mails of the upper side of the e-vehicle (vehicle No. 35 years of age, south) and the between the e-section

Summary of Evidence

1. D legal statement of the witness;

1. Stacks printed out of the victim’s vehicle booms, and CCTV images printed out at the parking lot of the Seoul Metropolitan Hospital (ROM);

1. The defendant asserts that he was placed around the victim's vehicle in order to verify whether the victim's vehicle is parked too close to the defendant's vehicle and that there is no damage to the victim's vehicle.

However, the circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, i.e., (i) the victim parked in the parking lot of Seoul Metropolitan Hospital around 15:30 on the day of this case and returned to around 19:00. The victim discovered a trace of damage on the upper right side of the twit line and the upper right side of the vehicle, and confirmed a video of the video of the twit line during the above hours, and there was a discovery that a man flabizes the twit line.

The statement, ② The image of the vehicle that the victim submitted to the investigative agency is confirmed that the defendant gets a hand on the upper part of the string line of the victim’s vehicle, ③ The CCTV image of the Seoul Metropolitan Hospital at the time of the instant case is confirmed that the victim’s vehicle was parked close to the defendant’s vehicle, and the fact that the defendant's vehicle was parked in the string line of the victim’s vehicle and the vehicle side of the defendant’s vehicle entered the victim’s vehicle and the rear side of the victim’s vehicle are confirmed. The fact that the victim’s vehicle was damaged and the front line of the victim’s vehicle are consistent with the victim’s vehicle, ④ the defendant’s contact information is confirmed in the investigative agency and this court.

arrow