beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the defendant's additional "2. Additional Judgment" as to the argument added by this court, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Additional determination
A. The Defendant’s new appraisal result of the first instance trial appraiser A of this case, by adopting the generally accepted standards, calculated the Plaintiff’s service quantity and importance of each construction design document, included the Plaintiff’s non-written or non-delivery to the Defendant in the object of appraisal in duplicate. The planning work not specified in the scope of the new design service contract of this case should be included and calculated in the design work. However, the Plaintiff’s total service ratio should be deemed as a separate work and evaluated the Plaintiff’s service cost by calculating the Plaintiff’s service cost as 108%.
B. The appraisal result of the judgment appraiser should be respected unless the appraisal method violates the empirical rules or is not reasonable.
(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2010Da93790, Nov. 29, 2012; 2004Da70420, 70437, Feb. 22, 2007; see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 1 through 26; 1 through 26; 2004Da70420, 70437, Feb. 22, 2007; 1) the appraisal results of the first instance trial appraiser A; 2) the fact-finding results of the first instance trial appraiser A; and 3) the fact-finding results of each fact-finding conducted by the first instance court and the first instance trial appraiser A; and 2) in light of the aforementioned legal principles, the Defendant’s aforementioned assertion is unreasonable.
1. Because there are various types of architectural design documents, there are inevitably differences in the value of efforts and completed architectural design documents required for their preparation.