1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was from April 25, 2012, the Defendant managed the Plaintiff’s general senior citizen center fund as a general secretary. However, even if a new general director was appointed on or around September 12, 2015, the Plaintiff’s money KRW 3,544,841 owned by the Plaintiff was not returned without keeping it in the Defendant’s spouse C’s deposit account. As such, the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff the said KRW 3,544,841 and damages for delay.

2. The following circumstances revealed by each statement in Gap 4 through 12, Eul 1 through 9, and 11 (including each number), the entire purport of pleadings, i.e., the defendant, as the general secretary of the plaintiff, managed the center fund for senior citizens, and at the same time managed the community fund as the head of A village. ② The defendant deposited and managed the plaintiff's funds in the deposit account in the former North Korean bank bank in the name of the plaintiff (Arogate), and transferred the above passbook and related documents to the general secretary newly appointed on or around September 2015. ③ Meanwhile, it is difficult to view the defendant to deposit the plaintiff's common funds in the former village with the head of the Tong at the expiration of one year from D around April 2010, the defendant did not have any criminal evidence of the defendant's spouse's embezzlement of funds in the name of the defendant's spouse, and on April 21, 2016, the defendant did not have any other criminal evidence of the defendant's 201.

Rather, in light of the above circumstances, the said money is the money.