logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.01.08 2014고단950
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 950] The Defendant returned home without paying the expenses for hospitalized treatment when receiving hospitalized treatment at C Hospital located in Macheon-si, from May 23, 2014 to May 26, 2014.

On May 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 14:30 on May 26, 2014, at a plastic container temporary accommodation located adjacent to a vinyl D, the Defendant: (b) found the victim E (34 years old), the chief of the headquarters of the said C Hospital, and the victim F (24 years old), who is an employee of the headquarters of the said C Hospital, to receive unpaid treatment costs; (c) asked the victim F (24 years old), “ACP” outside of the container stuff, “ACP,” thereby threatening the victim and the victims to “ethic and brut” out of the container stuff; and (d) took a knife the victim’s back to a different direction; and (e) took a knife the victim’s back to the victim E.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and threatened victims.

[2014 Highest 1499] The Defendant, around 17:20 on June 17, 2014, while taking a mobile phone call at the H “H” restaurant located in Y in Y in Yacheon-si around 17:20, the Defendant heard the horses from the victim I (the age of 57) who is a restaurant customer at the cafeteria, and led the victim to an injury of an open body of the victim, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s partial statement, each protocol of examination of witness I/J/K on E/F, each police protocol of investigation of the E/F, crime tool photographs, damaged photographs, and diagnosis papers on the case of 2014 Go-Ma1499, arguing that “The Defendant was interested and did not display only the simpled fish, but did not display it to the victim.” However, according to the testimony of J, which is a restaurant, and the photograph taken the victim’s upper part, the Defendant took a simpled fish, and the Defendant was faced with the victim’s growth.

arrow