1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. According to the record as to the legitimacy of the subsequent appeal, since the document of lawsuit, including a copy of the complaint of the court of first instance, and the original copy of the judgment, are served to the defendant by means of service by public notice, and the defendant becomes aware of the fact that the defendant was not aware of the lawsuit of this case and the pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance, it can be recognized that the subsequent appeal of this case was

2. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who engages in wholesale and retail business of construction materials under the trade name of “C”.

B. From the beginning of 2010 to December 2012, the Plaintiff supplied construction materials, such as wood, to the chain construction site (hereinafter “each construction site of this case”), such as Nowon-gu, Greenju, Masters-dong, sexual intercourse, Gun, old village, etc., which was established by D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company E”) from early 2010 to December 2012.

C. The supply price due to the Plaintiff’s trade account book at the construction site is KRW 12,919,000 in total, KRW 12,919,00 in the construction site at a new village, including KRW 1,271,520 in total at the construction site at the Nowon-gu, Seoul, and KRW 12,919,00 in total.

The Defendant, as the head of the Working Group at each construction site of this case, mobilized human resources, such as trees, etc. at each construction site of this case, and performed a wooden construction work.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, Eul evidence 6 (including the paper number), the purport of the whole pleadings.

3. The assertion and judgment

A. The summary of the assertion 1) The Plaintiff supplied the construction materials to the construction site of this case, which the Defendant was ordered by the Defendant, and the Defendant supplied to the construction site of this case, and did not receive KRW 12,919,000, out of the price of supplied goods. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 12,919,00 and the damages for delay thereof. 2) The Defendant is merely the number of items employed by the non-party company as the head of the Working Group in the construction site of this case

The Plaintiff’s transaction account book alone at each construction site of this case.