logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.05.12 2015고단4208
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a C-si.

On August 16, 2015, the Defendant, around 21:35, operated the three-lane road in front of the Seoul Southernbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (D), along the two-lanes and three-lanes of the Gangnam-gu Public Health Center as the area of the Gangwon-do Public Health Center.

At the time, there was a night and non-working, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver while driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found the victim E (53) on the front side of the vehicle running by the Defendant, which was in the front side of the vehicle running by the Defendant, due to the negligence of neglecting the two lanes, and caused the said victim to go beyond the ground by taking the left side of the si in front of the si. However, in order to avoid this, the Defendant failed to avoid it, and led the Defendant to go beyond the ground by taking the left side of the said victim’s sib in front of the si.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, it can be acknowledged that the victim submitted a written agreement stating that the victim would not want punishment against the Defendant after the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow