beta
Text
1. The defendants receive each corresponding amount of money as stated in the separate sheet No. 2 attached hereto from the plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction and rearrangement project association established to implement a housing reconstruction and rearrangement project (hereinafter “instant project”) on a scale of 118,069 square meters in Quwon, Sincheon-si. The Defendants are owners of each pertinent real estate (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) indicated in the attached Table 1 List located in the instant project zone.
B. On January 2, 2013, the Plaintiff sent a written peremptory notice to the Defendants within two months to the effect that they agree to the establishment of the Plaintiff’s association pursuant to Article 39 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) and Article 48 of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter “Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings”), but did not reach the Defendants.
Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit and notified the Defendants of whether they agree to the establishment of the Plaintiff Union in the complaint, and stated the intent to exercise the right to demand sale, and attached a written peremptory notice in writing.
C. The duplicate of the complaint of this case was served on each of the Defendants as indicated below. The Defendants did not answer whether they agree to the establishment of the Plaintiff Union until two months after being served with the duplicate of the complaint.
The service schedule No. 1 B No. 1 B of the date of service of the defendant 1 on January 10, 2014, the date of service of the defendant 1 B of the No. 2014, Oct. 23, 2013, K on May 9, 2014, 3D No. 10, Oct. 14, 2014, 4 E E on January 10, 2014, 10, 2014; 3. The defendant 1 did not have any dispute over the confession No. 5 on Oct. 12, 2013, 2013; 4. The defendant 1 did not have any dispute over the confession No. 741, Oct. 13, 2014; 10. 10. 14.