logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.02.02 2017고단1472
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle B with detached motor vehicles.

On October 20, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car on October 15:35, 2017, and proceeded bypassing the two-lane road in front of the DNA telecom in the following City C from the apartment on the direction of the apartment.

Since the location has a crosswalk where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the vehicle while checking whether a person engaged in driving the vehicle well sees the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle, and if there is a person to s

Nevertheless, when the defendant neglected to do so and proceeds as it is, the defendant got the victim E (the 75 years old) who dried the crosswalk from the right-hand side of the defendant's running, to the left-hand side in accordance with the pedestrian signals, and received the victim E (the 75 years old) more from the right-hand side of the above car

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury, such as pressure duplicating 12 in spine No. 12, which requires approximately 10 weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. E statements;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow