Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 10, 2014, at around 09:00 on February 10, 2014, the Defendant was the head of Seocheon-gun C, and the victim D (manam, 78 years old) was the head of the elderly group, and the Defendant was not able to appraise the victim’s usual remarks to the Defendant. On February 10, 2014, at around 09:00, the Defendant reported the victim on the alleyway side of the G Contracting State located in Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, and reported the victim’s “whether he would have she would have been able to do so.” The Defendant asked the victim’s son’s finger, etc. as soon as there is any defect that the victim would be able to get out of the breath of the breath of the breath and son’s son, who

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Around 08:00 on November 13, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim’s walk in the front of the port post office located in the Shincheon-gun, Seocheon-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, the head of the Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) followed the victim’s post office, and (c) took clothes after the victim’s back; and (d) the victim took a breath of the victim’s breath with the victim’s finger hand, leading the victim to the front of the Geumcheon-gu Police Station Park Jong-gu, the head of the Sincheon-gun-gun, the head of the Sincheon-gun, the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu.

2. The facts charged in the judgment above is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

On the other hand, the expression of intention not to punish is to be made to judicial police officers or prosecutors at the investigation stage and to the court after the prosecution is instituted, and it is not withdrawn after the expression of intention not to punish is made.

(Article 232(3) and (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act. With respect to this case, health rooms and witnesses D.