logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.10.12 2016가합60156
임금
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a company engaged in a business related to the management, operation, maintenance, repair, etc. of the Incheon State's provision, and the plaintiffs were employed as the defendant's contractual staff from the date specified in attached Form 2.

B. The reasons why the plaintiffs were selected as regular workers and the written employment contract (i.e., the defendant announced the "non-regular transition screening plan" around 2007, and decided to hire part of the contract employees with two or more years of employment as regular workers on a selective basis through work performance and interview. The defendant selected the final successful applicants, including the plaintiffs, as regular workers through interview from December 20, 2007 to December 24, 2007.

B. The Defendant made a public notice on December 31, 2007, stating that “A contract employment contract shall be terminated as of December 31, 2007, and shall be notified to the relevant position as of January 1, 2008,” and ② January 4, 2008, “a new resignation shall be confirmed and notified to the employees appointed as of January 1, 2008,” and ③ on January 17, 2008, the employees converted to a regular position as of January 17, 2008, prepared “a draft contract for the contract employment in 2008 and for the full-time workers converted to a regular position” and concluded an individual employment contract from January 21, 2008 to January 23, 2008.

【Defendant and the Plaintiffs, subject to the aforementioned process, set up a full-time employment contract as of January 1, 2008, with the Plaintiff’s general service class 5-7, based on the contract-based employment period.

"Appointment of full-time workers" in the total of the series of processes below.

The written employment contract prepared by the plaintiffs and the defendant contains the following contents in relation to the remuneration.

5. Remuneration: A fee for construction work shall be governed by;

However, if there is a wage agreement between the labor and the company on remuneration, it shall be done.It shall be done by the Corporation regardless of whether there is an increase or a decrease in remuneration due to the transition of general service.

arrow