Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Definitely: (a) on May 5, 2016, the Defendant was asked questions to the victims of “A”, among the police officers belonging to the D District Police Station of the Masan-dong Police Station of the Masan-dong Police Station, who was called out after having received a report on the existence of a person who was in finite at the “C” located in the Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si; (b) on the victim’s personal information; (c) on the part of the victims, the Defendant was asked of the victim E, who was a police officer belonging to the D District of the Masan-dong Police Station of the Masan-dong Police Station; (d) the said

Chewing ices shall not sound a bitch bitch, and turn on a bitch bitch. The bitch bitch shall turn out until it reaches the math.

Nor may do so to do so; or

The victims were openly insulting by referring to a large interest.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and on the same grounds as stated in paragraph (1) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), the police officer E, who was a police officer belonging to the police station located in the Masan-dong Police Station D coast guard, and the police officer, who was found to have attempted to arrest the Defendant as a current offender, to the said police officer, “grings and Chewing. The police officer did not have any job.”

“The above police officers sent a bath to “,” and the police officers sent the e-mail to the defective floor in which they want to take the lock of the Defendant, cut the F’s arms onto the floor, cut the F’s arms over the floor, and continued to go beyond the E’s body due to the defect that the above police officers attempted to put the Defendant on and back again, resulting in the danger that they want to wear the Defendant, and then cut the E’s body above the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention, suppression, investigation, and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against the F;

1. Application of the statutes on police statements made to G, E, and H;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (each.