logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.09.07 2018고정308
폭행
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around 15:30 on December 25, 2017, at the D parking lot located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si around 15:30 on December 25, 2017, when the victim E was assaulted by the victim E, the victim E left part of the victim E, and the victim F's body part of the victim F, who was at the end of the fighting.

Accordingly, Defendant A assaulted victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the defendant A or E;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (to attachCCTV image CDs);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty against Defendant B of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with respect to the order of provisional payment

1. On December 25, 2017, Defendant B, at the D parking lot located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, on December 25, 2017, reported that E assaults assaults, and “I will do so even.”

“In addition, the Victim F’s head was tightly sealed twice due to his fingers, and the Victim F’s head was fluored by assaulting from E influort E.

Accordingly, Defendant B abused the victim.

2. Each statement made by a witness E and F in the court and investigative agency to the effect that it conforms to the facts charged against Defendant B is difficult to believe it as it is in light of the facts and circumstances examined below and the attitude of statement in this court, and the remaining evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① On December 25, 2017, the day of the instant case, E did not make any statement as to Defendant B’s assault act at the time of the preparation of the written statement (in the face of 13 pages of investigation records).

E under the investigation conducted by the police on January 17, 2018, ‘I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I.

arrow