1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from May 10, 2017 to November 14, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 17, 2014, the Plaintiff became aware of the Defendant in Seoul, and began with the principal teaching system from February 1, 2015.

The plaintiff and the defendant met almost every day by 4 to 5 new walls, and the defendant had the key of the plaintiff's house at the time, and they freely downloaded to the plaintiff's house.

The defendant was the majority of the defendant, and he was the parent and the divided party.

B. The Plaintiff came to know of pregnancy in April 2015 while teaching with the Defendant.

The defendant did not know the parent thickness, but did not pay a living allowance, and the plaintiff was under an abortion operation on the ground that it is difficult to generate a child.

After that, the plaintiff and the defendant continued to provide teaching services.

C. On May 9, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) performed cream treatment; (b) on September 19, 2016, confirmed that the Plaintiff was pregnant with the Defendant and was pregnant for a period of four months.

Along with the fact, the defendant sought that “the situation is good,” but the plaintiff had been pregnant for four months or more, and the defendant also consented to the delivery of a defect, i.e., “the birth may not have a right to birth again.”

원고는 2016. 10. 10. 출산 준비를 위해 광주에 있는 어머니댁으로 이사했다.

In January 2017, the defendant participated in the plaintiff's Cho Jong-san, and the plaintiff introduced him as his father who was pregnant with the defendant to his father.

The defendant did not look at the plaintiff to the extent that it was all about 4 months after the plaintiff moved into Gwangju for a total of 6 months.

On February 2, 2017, the defendant received a gift from the parent thickness land, and sought a slaughter in Gyeonggi-do with such money, and borrowed KRW 5,00,000 from the plaintiff as necessary for gift tax, etc.

On March 21, 2017, the Plaintiff gave birth to her husband, but the Defendant sent the word “on March 26, 2017, by gambling,” and did not contact after sending the word “on March 26, 2017.” On March 29, 2017, the Plaintiff reported her husband and left contact again.

(e).