The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding the facts) is erroneous in the judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty, although the defendant was not guilty of the victim's chest.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, in particular the victim E's investigation agency and the court, according to the statement in the victim E's investigation agency and the court, the fact that the defendant left the subway 3 lines on the date stated in the facts charged in the instant case is sufficiently recognized that the defendant stopped at the subway station, and the victim's chest was faced with the victim's chest that was sitting at the entrance immediately next to the entrance, and that it was faced with the entrance, and even according to the investigation report (CCTV verification, search inspection request request, etc.), there is no room for confusion that the injured party designated the defendant as the offender because there is no room for confusion that the injured person was the defendant.

Therefore, the conclusion of the court below that found the Defendant guilty on the basis of the victim’s statement and CCTV images is just and acceptable, and there is no error in the misapprehension of facts, and the Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.