logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.08.09 2017고정277
여객자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who rents a commercial motor vehicle of a motor vehicle rental business operator is not allowed to use it for transport with compensation, but the Defendant used it for transport with compensation, such as transporting to EF in front of the “D Council member in Pyeongtaek-si C, around 13:54 on February 10, 2017, by using the B Hadrid B Hasa car rented from a motor vehicle rental business operator, and receiving KRW 7,000 in return.

2. Although a private motor vehicle is not provided for commercial transport, the Defendant provided a private motor vehicle for commercial transport at the front of “F” in Pyeongtaek-si E on February 16, 2017, which is a private motor vehicle, to the “I” way in the same city H, and in return, received KRW 10,000 in return.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written Statement;

1. Each report on commercial transport activities;

1. A vehicle rental contract;

1. Application of each statute on a written accusation;

1. Article applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 90 Subparag. 6-2 of the Passenger Transport Business Act, Article 34 Subparag. 1 of the same Act, Article 90 Subparag. 8 of the Passenger Transport Service Act, and Article 81 of the same Act, which relate to the selective punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow