logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.08.14 2018고단211
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Godan 211] On February 18, 2016, the Defendant purchased 20,000 won from the victim “E” restaurant operated by the victim in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on February 18, 2016 to purchase 20,000 won of the electric wheel 20,000 won and maintain it for three years and pay the rental fee of KRW 50,000 from the 50,000 to the 50,000 won per month to return the electric wheel wheel purchased at the expiration of three years.

On March 2016, 2016, the first police officer, ", at the same place, has five or more investors of the electric wheel wheeler business" to the victim at the same time.

Among the investors, there are also the president who has a police and has a pension.

At present, the investment amount has been raised more than KRW 200 million, and it will create KRW 300 million.

An investor is found to be more and later, 50,000,000 won that he/she received before making an investment of 40,000,000 won as business, and 50,000 won that he/she received before making an investment of 40,000 won, 50,000 won per month for three months, and 8,00,000 won per month for three months after 3 months, 50,000 won will be immediately returned if he/she does not receive electric wheelchairs for 3 months, 50,000 won will purchase 10,00 won of the electric wheelchairs and make it a siren business for 3 years, and 10,00 wheelchairs will have been used as a siren business.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the Defendant, without any particular positive property at the time, was liable for the debt amounting to KRW 46 million in total. At the time, only KRW 30 million was invested by three investors at the time, and the Defendant was unable to pay the profits that he promised to pay. Even if the Defendant was to receive the investment from the victim, only a part of the plan was planned to use it as the fund for purchase of wheel chairs, and the remainder was urgent to use it as the Defendant’s obligation repayment or cost of living. Thus, the Defendant paid the profits promised to the victim or the principal.

arrow