1. The Defendant’s 49,249,740 won and above amount to the Plaintiff:

(a) From March 5, 2018, for KRW 22,000,00:

(b) 21.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff (C to March 10, 2019) is a company established for the purpose of building business, interior fishery, etc., and the Defendant is a company established for the purpose of software development and supply business, system integration and construction business, etc.

B. Around January 2018, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded two interior contracts as follows, and the Plaintiff received KRW 10,000,000 in total from the Defendant, respectively, as down payment for each of the above construction contracts.

D Triph 1 Point - The contract date: The construction work date on January 3, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as "spaph 1 point construction"): The inner and external interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior te, private person, air conditioners - The construction place: Songpa-gu Seoul - the construction cost of KRW 25,000,000 (Additional tax rate): The remainder payment date: The contract date for the tethical construction (hereinafter referred to as "astronomical point construction"): The contract date: January 9, 2018 - The construction date: The execution date: The internal and outside interior tethra, private person, the air conditioners, etc. - the construction place: the construction cost of Gangdong-gu Seoul - the construction cost of KRW 27,00,00 (additional tax rate): the payment date: seven days after the remainder payment date: the fact that there is no dispute over the construction cost of KRW 25,00,00 (Additional tax rate): the purport of each pleading number No. 1 through 3).

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Plaintiff concluded two contracts for construction with the Defendant, and fulfilled all the construction. At the Defendant’s request, the Plaintiff incurred additional construction charges of KRW 1,863,40,00 by additionally proceeding internal crowdfunding and franchise card construction of the instant services at the Defendant’s request.

Therefore, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay KRW 21,863,40 as the remainder price of the construction project of this case and KRW 22,00,000 as the remainder price of the construction project of this case and KRW 49,249,740 (=value 43,8763,400 value-added tax of KRW 4,386,340) and damages for delay.

3. The judgment of the Plaintiff and the Defendant around January 2018 are the construction work of the Songpa-1, and the instant astronomical point.