1. Defendant A shall set forth in Attached Table 1-A.

In the real estate stated in the paragraph, Defendant B shall be respectively from the real estate listed in the attached Table 2 list.

1. E Co., Ltd., the implementer of the “D Urban Development Project,” which is an implementer of the “D Urban Development Project,” which is designated and implemented as the urban development zone, shall be as follows: the F 1,107 square meters and G farm site 334 square meters (hereinafter “each land of this case”); and the list 1 attached hereto located on each land of this case.

Each building listed in the subsection and attached Table 2 (hereinafter “each building of this case”) was transferred to the ownership due to the acquisition of the public land by consultation.

(F) On November 19, 2015, G land, December 29, 2015, and September 1, 2016, respectively). The Plaintiff is entrusted by E Co., Ltd. with ownership of each of the instant land and each of the instant buildings, and completed the registration of ownership transfer due to the trust.

Defendant A leased and occupied the building from the former owner H of the building listed in the attached Table 1 List and agreed on the above lease agreement around March 2016.

Defendant B leased each building listed in Section 1 of the attached Table 2 from the former owner H, and occupied the building listed in Section 2 of the same Table from the former owner I by granting a loan from the former owner I, and agreed on the above lease and loan agreement around March 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The Defendants asserted to the effect that the Plaintiff and both parties renounced their lawsuit and did not hold all civil and criminal responsibilities in the future. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this, so the Defendants’ instant safety defense is without merit.

B. According to the above facts of the judgment on the merits, the plaintiff's assertion seeking eviction against the defendants who occupy each of the buildings of this case as the exercise of the right to claim removal of disturbance based on ownership of each of the buildings of this case is with merit.

Therefore, Defendant A is therefore the attached Table 1-A of the attached Table 1.

on the real property described in paragraph (1);