1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 50,913,480 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its payment from January 19, 2013 to August 27, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant entered into a contract with China to export CIF conditions (including CIF conditions, Inc. and Financial Rights, freight and insurance premium) to the Enina Nu Total Engy Cr. (hereinafter “KIF”) 278,340 kilograms (hereinafter “the instant cargo”) including presses, 47 machinery, the sum of which is 278,340 kilograms (hereinafter “the instant cargo”).

B. According to the above sales contract, the Defendant: (a) requested the Plaintiff to transport the instant cargo at the Defendant’s factory located in emulation of the instant cargo from Incheon and Busan to the port of Busan; and (b) the sea transportation from the Incheon to the port of Busan to the port of Busan (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant transportation contract”); (c) the Plaintiff, among them, requested the emulshing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “tex”); and (d) eex tex tex tex tex tex (hereinafter referred to as “Et tex”); and (e) etex tex tex tex tex tte re-re tte tte tte tte tte tte tte tte tte tte tte tte tte tte tte tte tte

C. Accordingly, the plaintiff transported 45 of the cargo of this case to Incheon port at the defendant's factory where 47 U.S. was located, and entered the 45 cargo of this case into Incheon port by dividing it into 20 feet Rock Rocing container (Flat Rocingta), 40 feet pedle container (the plaintiff asserted that it is four, but according to the results of the fact inquiry conducted on May 19, 2014 for pande of this court, it seems that two were two) and 40 feet dra container (Dry tacinger).

On the other hand, the defendant packages up to 47 cargo of this case, one (56,000 g, the name of the product: C) among 47 cargo of this case, which cannot be loaded in the container due to a large volume of load and weight, and one (56,00 g, the name of the product: C).