Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 13, 2014, from around 21:23, to 21:50 on the same day, Defendant A’s business interference with the business of Defendant A demanded that the former and his/her visitors to the hotel room be the hotel’s expense. However, the victim F and his/her male employees on the ground that he/she refused to do so, he/she would threaten the victim’s access board to an Acrogate that was set up in the Kackter, and threaten the victim’s business as if he/she would be employed in the above name in the name of the said employee. The Defendant posted his/her photo with a Handphone, affixed his/her photo with a Handphone, and obstructed the victim’s hotel transport business by avoiding disturbance.

2. The Defendants’ violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) and obstruction of performance of official duties on the same day at the above E hotel hotel L, around 21:48 to 21:50 on the same day, and the Defendant A, who was sent to the Cheongdo Police Station G police station, was faced with a disturbance by the slope H belonging to the Cheongdo Police Station G police station that was called upon fighting, the Defendant A, with his left hand, saw the Defendant A to sat off the h’s arms with the left hand and left hand, and the Defendant B expressed the above H to “the h will come to satch, v., I will come to go to go to the right hand of the above h,” and the police box attached to the same police box that continuously restrains Defendant A.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties regarding the handling of the 112 Report Report Case by the Police Officers H and I, and at the same time, the victim H(the 40-year-old age) was at the salt and tension of the arms elbbow requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, and the plebow was at the top.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol against J;

1. Each police statement made to I, H, and F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTVs for hotels 1.