The judgment below

The part of confiscation and collection shall be reversed.

It is presumed that a seized philophone is presumed to have been seized.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (four years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

(a) In the event that: (i) the articles seized are not existing at the time of rendering the judgment on ex officio determination (i) 1; (ii) 3; (iii) flogram 1; (iv) flogram 1; (iv) flogram 2; (iv) flogram 1; (v) flogram 1; (v) flogram 1; (v) flogram 2; (v) flogram 1; (v) flogram flogram 1; (v) flogram 2; (v) flogram flogram 1; and (v) flogram 9; (v) flogram flogram 1; (v) flogram flogram 2; and (v) flogram 9; (v) flogram flogram 2; and (v) flogram 9; (v) flogram flogram 1;

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, approximately 0.38g of white-sum (including plastic packaging) presumed to be seized philopon (Evidence No. 2537 of Seoul Northern District Prosecutors' Office No. 2016).