1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,684,932 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from November 20, 2018 to March 4, 2019.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 31, 2016, the Plaintiff leased the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment D (hereinafter “instant apartment”) with a deposit of KRW 1,300,000,000, and the contract term from July 10, 2016 to July 9, 2018 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”); and the Plaintiff paid the said deposit to the Defendant, and began to reside in the instant apartment from July 10, 2016 to July 10, 2016.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed on the renewal of the lease contract from around May 3, 2018, but did not reach an agreement as to whether the Defendant refused the Plaintiff’s request that the deposit be reduced and renewed.

On June 26, 2018, the defendant sent a text message to the plaintiff on June 26, 2018, stating that "it is no longer possible to send any word known to the plaintiff as to whether it is extended until September 10, 2018, in writing, to the extended time when it is impossible to transmit the text message." The plaintiff sent a text message to the defendant on June 26, 2018, and if it is not necessary to consult on the same day, the contract is terminated."

7. It shall be as soon as possible from 10. to 10.

“The next day is proposed by the President.”

9. 10. The case where a tenant of the Rotterdam who is to be a director is found to be inside;

9. 10.M. 10.M.W. 10.C.

Each text message is sent.

C. On September 10, 2018, the Plaintiff left the instant apartment and moved to a director. On September 20, 2018, the Plaintiff completed the right of lease registration with respect to the instant apartment and filed a move-in report with the new director.

On September 20, 2018, the Plaintiff sent a text message to the Defendant to the effect that the key to the apartment of this case directly delivers the key to E-real estate or leave it to the said real estate, and if not, deliver it directly to the Defendant’s domicile. However, the Defendant did not respond thereto.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 5 (including the provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of recognition, the above facts of recognition are examined.