beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On August 25, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection, etc. of Victims Thereof at the Busan High Court (special rape) and completed the execution of the sentence on April 17, 2015. On August 4, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of obstructing the performance of public duties in the Jinwon District Court’s Jinju branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 28, 2018.
[2] The Defendant, on August 5, 2017, appeared to take an oath as a witness of the case, such as interference with the Defendant’s special duties performed by the Changwon District Court No. 201, Jinwon Branch No. 2017 Jinwon Branch No. 201, Jul. 19, 2017 at Jinwon District Court Jinwon Branch No. 201, Jul. 19, 2017, and even though he did not threaten A to wear a knife, the Defendant did not have any such fact.
A false testimony was made, a written complaint stating that “A request to punish perjury shall be punished for perjury,” was submitted to the Jinju-si branch office of the Changwon District District Prosecutors’ Office located in 301 (Newandong-dong-dong-dong-dong), and made a statement to the Jinju-si Police Station D and the Superintendent E for the same purpose on the 31st day of the same month.
However, on January 4, 2016, around 23:27, at the defendant's house located in the F building G in Jinju City, a warning was issued to block the whole of the tracking devices attached by the defendant, and this is why C, who is in charge of the management of the subject of the tracking devices, called the defendant's house to ask him about the circumstances, and the defendant was able to take up excessive steps under the bee of the bee while the defendant took a bath.
In addition, C had been present as a witness of a case that interfered with the execution of special official duties against the defendant, and C did not have made a false testimony in the court.
Accordingly, the defendant is aimed at having C receive criminal punishment.