logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2016.07.12 2016고단60
재물손괴
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,00 and by a fine of KRW 2,00,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A worked as an employee in the Frenna operated by the victim E in Kim Jong-si from around May 2012 to the end of May 2015.

Defendant

B is the friendship of Defendant A.

1. Defendant A: (a) after the victim her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her was

While the Defendant had worked for a longer period than G, the Defendant thought that the victim was neglected to pay the same wages as G, and that the victim was dead.

Accordingly, the Defendant intentionally thought that the damaged person caused the flooding of the I car in an amount equivalent to KRW 59.9 million at the market price, which is actually owned and operated under the name of the wife H.

The defendant has a day to use personally from the injured party on May 6, 2015.

On May 7, 2015, 05:40 on May 7, 2015, 2015, after borrowing the car of the ASEAN, the car was flooded by intentionally moving the car of the ASEAN from the irrigation channel near the bridge located in Kim Jong-si.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. Defendant B knew at the date, time, place, as described in paragraph 1, that the victim E had intentionally flooded a passenger car with an amount equivalent to KRW 59.9 million at the market price owned by the victim E, as described in paragraph 1, and reported on behalf of Defendant B to 119 as if the said car fell into the farm waterway due to an accident on behalf of Defendant A.

Accordingly, the defendant aided and abetted the crime of damage to property by facilitating the crime A.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to J and H;

1. A written statement prepared by the J (73 pages of investigation records);

1. An investigation report (related to the verification of the identity of the 119 reporter), an investigation report (related to the analysis of vehicle booms stored images).

arrow