The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of 8 months for the crime No. 1 in its holding and the imprisonment of 2 months for the crime No. 2 in its holding) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime, and agreed with the person who was the name of the head of the Tong C.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was punished for larceny six times; (b) the Defendant was punished for driving without a license five times; (c) the Defendant committed a repeated crime as indicated in the holding during the period of a repeated crime due to a special larceny; (d) the Defendant committed a crime in violation of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from Sexual Abuse; (e) the Defendant committed a repeated crime as indicated in the holding during the period of a repeated crime due to a violation of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from Sexual Abuse; (e) the Defendant’s age, background, and circumstances after the commission of the crime; and (e) other circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant argument, even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant,

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.