logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2019.03.07 2018고정311 (1)
자동차손해배상보장법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 11, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and four years for fraud, etc. in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on November 20, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 20, 2017.

The Defendant is the actual holder of the vehicle B.

Although the owner of a motor vehicle is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance, etc. on the road, he/she operated the motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance at the location of the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Inquiries into non-insurance operation vehicles, inquiries into mandatory insurance contract terms, and perusal of the register of motor vehicles;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire criminal records, report on the results of confirmation of the previous disposition, and report on criminal investigation (report on the confirmation of separate judgments related to Defendant A, No. 2018 Go-Ma311);

1. Relevant Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into consideration all the circumstances, such as the frequency of operation of automobiles for which no mandatory insurance was subscribed for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the fact that it shall be judged concurrently with the crime of previous conviction in which judgment has become final and conclusive, and

arrow