1. The Defendant: 70,199,774 won to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from February 18, 2012 to February 13, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 18, 2012, around 08:20 on 08:20, 2012, the Plaintiff and D were engaged in nitrocal practice, and the Defendant and E were engaged in nitrocal practice in the other half of the year.

B. During that process, the Plaintiff suffered injury from the Defendant’s blood transfusions, vegetable wave fevers, vegetable melting the right eye on the hole that the Defendant, who had been in the direction of the blind line, and suffered from the injury of the Defendant’s blood transfusions, vegetable melting the vegetable melting design, net heat fevers, vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable acid, and vegetable vegetable vegetable transfusions.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, the entry of Gap evidence 3-1, 2, and Eul evidence 5, the witness D’s testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The defendant's liability for damages against the plaintiff

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as to Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 4, 5, and 8, Eul evidence 3, witness Eul evidence 3, and witness D's testimony, the plaintiff and the defendant et al. used two teams without special protective facilities by dividing one cat under mutual understanding into one catum from the center's body to the center's body. At the time of the accident at the time of the accident, the plaintiff and D were engaged in cather first in the above apartment complex, for which the catry was located, but the two teams were engaged in cather practice using two teams near the plaintiff et al. with the understanding of the plaintiff et al., the plaintiff et al., and the defendant were relatively lower than 30 years and 30 years of experience in the accident at the time of the accident, the plaintiff et al., and the defendant were relatively lower than the plaintiff et al., the plaintiff et al., and the defendant contained in the catum.