beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud at the Daejeon District Court on January 20, 2010 and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 8, 2010, and completed the execution of the sentence on May 26, 201.
[Criminal facts] 2013 Highest 7819 (Defendants)
1. On September 4, 2012, Defendant A was involved in a traffic accident near the Dong-dong Underground Road of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. In such a case, even though Defendant A suffered minor damage with the knowledge that an insurance company to be hospitalized at a hospital would be able to receive insurance proceeds, such as a more traffic accident agreement, but he/she neglected it and neglected it to have the insurance company acquired insurance proceeds by deceiving the insurance company as if the insurance company was actually hospitalized.
Accordingly, Defendant A did not have received substantive hospitalized treatment, such as going out of the hospital, going out of the hospital during the hospitalization period, and going out of the hospital without receiving any medical treatment from “E” located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon. However, around September 4, 2012, Defendant A claimed insurance money as if he received hospitalized treatment from the victim Dong-dong Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd. for eight days.
Accordingly, Defendant A deceiving the victim as above and delivered KRW 600,000 to the victim on September 13, 2012, and had the above member paid KRW 264,000 on September 14, 2012.
2. Defendant A, Defendant B, together with F, G, H, and I, conspired to acquire insurance proceeds by intentionally causing a traffic accident.
Accordingly, Defendant A’s insurance proceeds acquired in the future by notifying the method of crime shall be collected in a lump sum and distributed to accomplices, provide a shower car owned by Defendant J-Ma for the purpose of a melting vehicle, and F is to delete the part of Defendant A’s ex officio without undergoing amendments to indictment to the extent that it does not pose a substantial disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of the Defendant’s right of defense within the extent consistent with the facts charged.