logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.08.22 2012고단2788
자동차손해배상보장법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 22, 2012, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) around 09:30, the Defendant operated C dump trucks owned by the Defendant without purchasing a mandatory automobile insurance policy at a distance of approximately 30 km from the roads that he/she is not aware of the error revolution of Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu to the road 482-9, Mapo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government

2. The accused who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act is a dump truck driver;

At around 09:30 on November 22, 2012, the Defendant proceeded at a speed that would not be known along the two-lanes of the above road, leading to the direction of the network origin from the direction of Mapo-gu Office, Mapo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government 482-9.

A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the motor vehicle well, operating the steering gear, brake system, etc. accurately and safely.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the Defendant, while neglecting this and stopping in order to signal atmosphere, caused the Defendant’s above cargo vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the same lane while driving in front of the same lane, the Defendant followed the E-ro vehicle in the victim D(32 years old) in front of the same lane, and received the part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s scopical salt scopic and tensions requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, damaged the Defendant’s total amount of KRW 594,018, such as a pan-scopic to the damaged car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mandatory insurance;

1. Article 3(1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, concerning criminal facts (the point of causing occupational injury).

arrow