1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs each amount stated in the "total sum of claims" in the list of claims by plaintiff in attached Form.

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry of Gap evidence of Nos. 1 to 12 (including each number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply):

The relationship between the parties concerned is a company that mainly runs the business of selling teaching materials for early childhood education to early childhood education institutions. The plaintiffs are those who have concluded a contract with the defendant and operated the defendant's branch while retired while serving as the defendant's employee.

B. 1) When the management status of the defendant becomes worse as the wages in arrears against the plaintiffs exceeded 10 million won, the plaintiffs and the defendant agreed at the conclusion of the contract of the branch with the plaintiffs as follows at the end of each relevant service period stated in the separate sheet "service period" as stated in the separate sheet. In other words, the defendant, instead of paying wages in arrears and retirement pay to the plaintiffs, shall be settled by deducting the sales outstanding amount to be paid by the plaintiffs to the defendant and the premium for the establishment of the branch calculated by the defendant (which seems to be based on the average sales of the immediately preceding one month) from the sales outstanding amount to be paid by the plaintiffs to the defendant. However, when concluding the contract of the branch as above, the defendant would return the sales amount before the termination of the contract of the branch (the amount equivalent to the premium

C. On December 9, 2013, the Defendant at the end of a branch contract: (a) transferred all the rights to contents, such as teaching materials, to C; and (b) provided any more teaching materials, etc. to the Plaintiffs who concluded the branch contract; (c) the Plaintiffs concluded a new branch contract with C as the Defendant’s principal agent; (d) thereby, the contract between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant was terminated at that time.

(On the other hand, the plaintiff D transferred the malicious branch office operated around July 2013 to a third party and the branch contract was terminated).

contract amounts and.