beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On September 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the District Court of the Republic of Korea on July 25, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence in the lawsuit of the first intersection of the North Korean Peninsula North Korea on July 25, 2016
1. "2017 Highest 1189";
A. On April 1, 2017, around 23:10 on April 1, 2017, the Defendant issued an order for alcoholic beverage and alcoholic beverage in 1 room operated by the victim C in Songpa-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Songpa-gu, Seoul.
However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with alcohol, alcohol, or alcohol from the injured party because there was no means of payment such as cash or credit card in his possession.
Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above, the victim was provided with 12 C, 1 C, 1 C, 1 C, and 1 C, etc. at the market price equivalent to 500,000,000 won in the same place from the victim’s position.
B. Around 03:10 on April 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender for committing a fraudulent act under paragraph (1) at the F District of the Seoul Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Police Station located in Songpa-gu Seoul, and was transferred to the same district; and (b) made a public insult of the victim G with the victim’s police officers and petitioners, etc., who are affiliated with the said F District G, the Defendant called “Ie the victim, who is the head of the police station affiliated with the said F District, who is the victim of the said F District, “Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie I am am son, Ie Ie I am
2. On August 21, 2017, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol to the victim as if he would pay the normal drinking value at the main point of “J” operated by the victim I in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H on August 21, 2017.
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price normally even if he received the payment from the injured party due to the lack of means of payment such as cash or credit card in possession.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and is equivalent to 33,00 won at the market price from the victim.