A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant on April 30, 2009 sentenced on April 30, 2009 to a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of the Military Service Act by the Seoul Northern District Court.

5. 8. The above judgment became final and conclusive and was in the grace period until May 7, 2010.

From June 11, 2006, the Defendant was serving as a public duty personnel (social work personnel) in Seoul Metropolitan Government D Transportation Division located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from August 10, 2006 to October 28, 2006, and was accused of criminal punishment due to a failure to serve without any justifiable reason during the period from August 10, 2006 to December 10, 2009, and was planned to dismiss from service on October 17, 201, but the Defendant was under the plan to dismiss from service on October 17, 201. However, the Defendant did not work at the workplace from January 6, 201 to October 8 of the same month and from October 25, 2014 to work without justifiable grounds, and did not work at the workplace for at least eight days without permission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written investigation of the escape from service;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records;

1. Criminal facts before the amendment by Act No. 955 of January 25, 2010, under Article 89-2 subparagraph 1 of the relevant Article of the Military Service Act;

1. The defendant for the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances among the following sentencing grounds) is a public interest service personnel. On April 30, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to one year of the suspended sentence for a violation of the Military Service Act by a renunciation of service on April 30, 2009, and re-service was commenced for a period of time, but he did not escape from his service while

However, it is difficult for the defendant to work in the family form at the time when he had to support the suffering of alcohol, and the defendant to work in the place of human service due to traffic accident after the aftermath of the traffic accident, and it seems that it was difficult for him to work in the place of his residence, since the father died on January 201, and the defendant's health was restored, so at this time, he is going to complete the remaining work after returning to the place of work, form home, form the defendant's age, character and behavior, circumstances after the crime, etc.