The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The Defendant asserts that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as the grounds for appeal of this case are too unreasonable.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions and arguments in this case’s records and arguments, and the fact that the victim’s bereaved family members and the victim’s bereaved family members have reached a unanimous agreement, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, since the appeal by the defendant is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the following is ruled again

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and the facts charged by the defendant and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are the same as the corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 5-11 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 148 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act;

1. The proviso to Article 35 and the proviso to Article 42 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and the proviso of Article 50 and Article 42 of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1,