logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.11.06 2018고단1691
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and eight months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On December 1, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 9, 2017.

1. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim B on June 16, 2014, at the Dtel underground parking lot in which the victim B residing in the Matel-si, Gyeonggi-si, B, the Defendant was operating the MaE in the old workplace, and the project is well being carried out.

In addition, vehicle purchase cost is insufficient.

The interest rate of 24% per annum shall be paid with the loan of money and the principal shall be paid in full.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant should pay the existing debt borrowed for the rental car business at the time, and even if he borrowed the above money from the injured party, he thought that it will be used as the repayment of the previous debt, repayment of the above debt, business operation fund, etc., and there was no ability to pay interest of 24% per annum on the principal and principal to the injured party.

Defendant 1 received money of KRW 150 million from the victim’s bank account in the name of the Defendant and acquired money of KRW 2220,90,000 through seven times in total, as shown in attached Table 1 of the List of Crimes, including the transfer of KRW 150,000 from the victim’s bank account in the above false statement.

2. The Defendant committed the crime against Victim G is well doing business as above.

On June 10, 2016, trust with the above B made a false statement to the victim G for the same purpose as Paragraph 1 at the main office of the J(B) in the building in Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-si, and the victim G (B) in the victim G (B).

However, the defendant should pay the existing debt borrowed for the rental car business at the time, and even if he borrowed the above money from the injured party, he was willing to use it as the repayment of the previous debt, repayment of the above debt, business operation fund, etc.

The defendant belongs to the above false statements.

arrow