1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim against the defendant is dismissed.

2...

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive personal automobile insurance contract for E and F low-priced other vehicles (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs”).

The defendant is the owner of the G District's agricultural reservoir height project (hereinafter "the construction of this case"), C is the contractor who has been awarded a contract by the defendant for the construction of this case, and D is the subcontractor who has been awarded a subcontract by C for the construction of this case among the construction of this case.

E On October 25, 2014, around 03:00, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was driven by the Plaintiff, and the temporary roads adjacent to the I reservoir located in Hari-si in Jriri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri (hereinafter “E”), and the Plaintiff’s vehicle was partially damaged by the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the injury, such as the discharge frame No. 2

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The said road, as part of the instant construction, is a non-packaged temporary road opened around October 24, 2014, around 18:00, by expanding the width of 10 meters on the side of the existing road, which is the first line passing by reservoir as part of the instant construction.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant road.” The point of the instant accident is at the direction of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “instant road”) the bend, bend, bend, the direction of the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s driving direction, and the 7 to 8m degree, lower than the right edge of the road, and the I reservoir is located next to it.

On October 24, 2014, when the instant road is opened temporarily on or around 18:00, the PEdrum and its sound knowledge and warning devices (in addition to electric wires, on-and-off devices, on-and-off devices, so as to be installed on the right side of the road.

After the accident in this case, the Plaintiff paid KRW 120,00,000, total of KRW 130,962,260, and KRW 130,962, and260 to E as compensation for damages calculated by taking account of medical expenses 10,962,260, and 30% of the negligence in each of the subparagraphs. The Plaintiff paid the automobile injury coverage insurance (defluence data, etc.) to E and the vehicle damage insurance.