The judgment of the first instance is revoked.

All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 1, 2005, an I forest 28,008 square meters (hereinafter “the mother land of this case”) was divided into 3,820 square meters of I forest, G forest 2,834 square meters, H forest 77 square meters, J forest 3,637 square meters, K forest 4,321 square meters, L forest 3,820 square meters, M forest 2,762 square meters, N forest 3,037 square meters, D forest 3,000 square meters, and D forest 3,000 square meters on the same day, once again divided into D forest 92 square meters, E forest 507 square meters of forest, F forest 509 square meters of forest, C92 square meters of forest 3,000 square meters of forest and 92 square meters of forest (hereinafter “O forest and 3,000 square meters of forest and 3,000 square meters of forest and 3,000 square meters of forest are divided under each of each land.

[Reg 1] JIK LGF CP Po D M H

B. As above, on July 1, 2005, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of sale on June 27, 2005 with respect to each of 1/2 shares of D forest 992 square meters, E forest 507 square meters, F forest 509 square meters, C forest 92 square meters (a double C 992 square meters, “the Plaintiff’s land”).

(c)

The Defendant is the owner of B 2,559 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant’s land”) located adjacent to the Plaintiff’s land. The Defendant is the owner of B 2,59 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant’s land,” and the part indicated (A) in the attached drawing Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the Defendant’s land in the instant case, which is located adjacent to the Plaintiff’s land.).

(d)

The location of the Plaintiff’s land and the Defendant’s land is as indicated below (forest 2), and as indicated below (forest 3). The part of the instant dispute falls under the part of “b” with the indication [forest 3], and the part of the instant dispute falls under the part of “b” with the indication, and the Plaintiff’s land is not adjacent

[Reforest 2] [Reforest 3] [Ground for Recognition] A] An unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 4, 6, Eul evidence 1 through 19, 23 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) or video, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On January 4, 2018, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff obtained permission for solar power plant construction on the instant Plaintiff’s land from the Jinjin market. There was no passage necessary to construct and operate the said solar power plant on the instant land, and among the instant Defendant’s land.