A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) the C Development Committee decided on March 11, 2017 to gather opinions from residents on the agenda on the closure of a community center building used by the existing residents for the purpose of the center for senior citizens; (b) the head of the Tong C, including the Defendant, sent a document of gathering consensus on the use of the C Welfare Center ( currently used as the community center) to the head of the Ban C, including the Defendant; (c) on the ground that it is difficult for residents to gather their opinions and obtain signatures by gathering consensus from residents because there are many cases where they are bad for themselves and there are no houses; (d) as if the residents agree to the above agenda, the Defendant attempted to enter the signature book without permission, and forged the resident’s signature to send it to D.

On June 2017, the Defendant voluntarily stated the F’s name in his/her residence in Samman-si E, which was in his/her own residence, and signed as “F” on the next page by means of the foregoing: G, H, I, J, K, L, M, M, P, P, Q, Q, P, S, T, U, V, M, X, Y, Z, AAB, AB, AC, AD, AD, AE, AE, AE, etc.; on the next day, the Defendant entered the name of “F” in his/her own residence; and used it by means of inserting a forged written gathering of opinions; and then, the Defendant entered it in D’s post without knowledge of the following reason, sent it to D by means of inserting such forged written gathering of opinions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D by the prosecution;

1. C minutes;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to gather consensus on the cases of using the C Welfare Center ( currently in use as a village center);

1. Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 239 of the same Act on the criminal facts) and Article 239(2) and Article 239(1) of the same Act on the criminal facts (the point of exercising the above investigation’s signature);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the following conditions are as follows, and the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime.