The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who, after acquiring D on February 4, 2013, changed the name of the company to E-ro, Inc. and the name of the company around April 22, 2014 to F (hereinafter “instant company”) and substantially operated around February 21, 2013 after changing it to F (hereinafter “instant company”).

In fact, the company of this case has a debt equivalent to KRW 192,043,130, such as subcontract price, loan, and public imposts, and the defendant was well aware of the financial status of the company of this case, and in such a case, the defendant who wants to sell the company of this case to another person was obligated to notify the purchaser of the financial status of the company of this case. However, on May 30, 2014, the defendant entered into a contract with the victim J through I among the office 602 H of Seoul Jongno-gu G Building 602, and entered into the contract to transfer all the financial status of the company of this case to the company of this case to the victim J through I, while concealing the existence of financial obligation of this case, and as if the company of this case did not have any debt such as loan, etc. of this case, "I will not have any debt such as down payment, loan, and public imposts, and will be subject to civil and criminal punishment as well as compensation upon occurrence of the problem, and enter into the contract with the victim of this case with the victim and its money.

2. Determination

A. In a criminal trial, the conviction of guilt ought to be based on evidence of probative value, which leads a judge to have a conviction that is beyond a reasonable doubt, to such a degree that the facts charged are true. Therefore, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof fails to sufficiently reach the degree that such conviction would lead to a defendant’s interest, even if there is a suspicion of guilt, the determination is inevitable.

(b) Records.