The defendant shall be innocent.

The Defendant is a staff member of “F” who supplies alcoholic beverages to the “E” at a general restaurant in Inn City D operated by B (Inn, 37 years of age, Ga. C).

At around March 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) visited “E” under the name of “E” with two judices and two knife to drink to a trader; and (b) caused the Defendant’s desire to drink, and hyms and hyms to the left side, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, etc., of B.

Judgment

The evidence that corresponds to the facts charged in this case is only the statement B.

The G's statement, which was the husband of B, is based on B's statement, and most statements are not about the witness of this case, and there is a lack of independent value of evidence.

Therefore, the credibility of the B's statement is problematic, and the B's statement is not reliable for the following reasons.

(1) The statements in B are as follows: (a) the Defendant was present in the Defendant’s drinking place five times; and (b) the Defendant was able to write down his left jum, knife, and knife and knife on his left knife, and knife knife and knife his knife.

However, according to the witness H’s testimony which first appeared in the drinking place, the defendant could not see that the defendant's indecent act as above, and the witness I's legal statement, which the defendant and the drinking place together, did not seem to have been at a distance from the beginning to the end, and did not conclude that the defendant did not commit indecent act by compulsion.

B It is a statement to the effect that H is highly likely to make a false statement on the instant case because he/she has filed a complaint on June 8, 2018 by embezzlement of H. However, H is also at the time when the police officer makes a false statement during the instant investigation process to a police officer by telephone conversations (see, e.g., May 15, 2018).