logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.07.07 2016나28684
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is the same as the part of "1. Basic Facts" among the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant’s defamation and obstruction of business caused by the Defendant’s false fact-finding of prisoners of war caused damage to the Plaintiff’s reputation, infringed on the Plaintiff’s personality right, insulting the Plaintiff, and interfered with the Plaintiff’s business by forcing the Nonparty to visit the Nonparty Company.

As a result, the plaintiff suffered serious mental pain, the defendant must pay 20 million won to the plaintiff as consolation money due to the above tort.

① Around April 2015, the Defendant spreads false facts to the J, which operates a licensed real estate agent office on the first floor of the instant commercial building, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant paid the Defendant the amount of money equivalent to KRW 90,000,000 to the Defendant at the time of the Defendant’s position as a director of the Nonparty Company; (b) however, the Plaintiff did not impose more than KRW 30,00,000 in cash with the Non-Party Company; and (c) the customer was only made use of the Plaintiff and K.

② The Defendant removed the Plaintiff’s money from K to the real estate intermediaries of the instant commercial building on the following day: “K removed the Plaintiff’s money, and separately deducted the Plaintiff; the Plaintiff asked any hole, and the satisfaction behavior of the Plaintiff “,” which the Plaintiff spawd with K.

③ Around May 2015, the Defendant told J to take the ownership share in the instant land by either the Plaintiff and K to deduct the ownership share in the instant land.

④ The Defendant may not go to J around May 2015 at absolute intervals in the office of Nonparty 2’s non-party company.

In addition, the plaintiff and K Na are trying to drive away from commercial buildings.

‘The phrase ‘defluence' spreads false facts.

(5) The defendant shall file an objection on May 2015.

arrow